In an article on
congestion in the air and on the tarmac, The New York Times travel writer Joe Sharkey offers this anecdote:
It’s clear that more business travelers are choosing to drive rather than fly. Will Allen III, a Raleigh, N.C., management consultant who is on the road five days a week, monitored delays piling up at O’Hare International Airport one day in March, and decided instead to drive from Raleigh to Chicago, renting a Toyota Avalon for the 1,700-mile round trip. . . . .
Mr. Allen is a kind of business traveler Everyman, and I take his temperature on occasion. I’ve never heard him sound so unhappy about air travel.
“The next time I feel I’m being held hostage by the airlines, I’m calling Hertz,” he said.
Why wouldn't he call Amtrak? Unfortunately, that's an easy one: Raleigh-Chicago is a 30-hour trip that includes a 4-hour layover in Washington, to connect from the Silver Star to the Capitol Limited. It just doesn't work for business.
Now if you're a rail "fan," your first impulse is to bash that stupid Mister Amtrak, but the truth as usual is a bit more complicated--and way less satisfying. Call this another example of the consequences of
chronic undercapitalization and a year-to-year mandate. Congress's neglect has frozen Amtrak's national network in time.
Specifically 1971.Back at the dawn of Amtrak, Chicago-Raleigh wasn't much of a city pair. But in the last 30 years, the Raleigh-Durham metro area has
more than doubled in population. In the last 3½ years alone, the city of Raleigh added nearly 40,000 new residents all by itself.
It takes analysis and vision to identify new markets.
But that's the easy part. Developing them takes time and capital. It's way past time for Congress to supply Amtrak with both. Because 1, 700 miles is too long to drive on business.